
Core Advisory
Decide with integrity
MERL · Strategy · Institutions
Evidence leadership can defend under real constraints.
Altamont Advisory · Global Institutional Consulting
Not just the workshop — methods built for political economy, absorption capacity, and multi-partner pressure.
MERL · Education systems · Decision-grade AI for ministries, UN agencies, and INGOs.
Engage
Response within two business days
Major, multi-year programmes need a senior team behind them, not a lone advisor.
Brief the teamAn open RFP or Terms of Reference, ready to bid — send the deadline and scope.
Send deadline & scopeShortlist pack — overview, Advisory, EdWorX, AI & Digital, MERL, IMP sample. Instant access.
Get the packFrictionless advisory procurement
Fixed-fee pilot entry. Transparent packages. Scope designed in days — not another opaque proposal cycle. Same Implementation Integrity standard; residual capacity still required.
A frictionless way to buy institutional MERL advisory — transparent packages, fixed-fee pilot entry, and residual capacity under the same Implementation Integrity standard. Built for procurement teams and programme leads who need clarity without a full RFP cycle.
Many conventional MERL advisory RFPs cost organisations an estimated $6–10k in internal process time before delivery begins.
Why this works for procurement
Method
Diagnose the decision. Design for implementation. Embed what must remain.
One practice, three arms, one quality bar — no cold handoffs.
Diagnose
Start where the client is under pressure — what must be decided, funded, or defended. Only then reverse-engineer evidence and constraints. If the decision is unclear, the method is premature — and we say so.
Design
Methods fit absorption capacity, political economy, and the operating environment. Global standards held with local realism — especially in multi-country, multi-partner work.
Embed
Tools, standards, and learning loops stay with the teams. The test of Implementation Integrity: the system still works when we are no longer in the room.
Primary shortlist asset
Premium institutional PDFs for ministry and UN evaluators — positioning, capabilities, proof, and next step.
Instant download · No gate · Procurement-ready
Institutional weight
Depth across multi-country portfolios — Africa, Southeast Asia, and complex delivery environments.
950+
Institutional assignments
100M+
People reached
150+
Countries of delivery
300+
Specialists deployed
Shortlist materials for procurement and evaluation committees.
Download capability statementsThree expert arms
Implementation Integrity

Decide with integrity
MERL · Strategy · Institutions
Evidence leadership can defend under real constraints.

Build capability that lasts
Education systems · Scale
Systems and ownership that remain after the team leaves.

Equip intelligence that holds
Decision-grade AI · Governance
Intelligence teams can use, govern, and sustain — not a dead pilot.
Evidence + systems + intelligence — one conversation.
Impact Management Platform · Altamont Digital
Operational proof of Implementation Integrity — not a homepage product track. Residual capacity: structures, indicators, and findings trails remain with the organisation after close-out.
Diagnostic sample — not a free pilot.
Consultants and contractors: Partner programme.
Delivery + purpose-based consent
MERL, results & evaluation
Finance (EMS) · org-scoped
Why shortlist us
Designs tested against politics, timelines, and absorption — not workshop-only frameworks.
OECD-DAC and global norms where required, adapted to multi-partner constraints.
Core Advisory, EdWorX, and AI & Digital under one quality bar — no cold handoffs mid-mandate.
Tools, standards, and evidence trails stay with your teams after close-out.
How we think with you
Implementation Integrity
Where many stop
Where we stay
Delivery footprint
Africa, Southeast Asia, and other high-stakes multi-country environments
Offices: Dubai · Atlanta · Vancouver

Selected work
Multi-region · Africa & multi-country portfolios
Outcome leadership defended
Board reallocation defended with comparable country evidence and a utilisation cycle managers actually used.
Pressure
90 days to reallocate mid-cycle across African country offices. Results incomparable. Partners disputed “good.” Millions at stake.
Multi-country · high-stakes operating environment
Outcome leadership defended
Prioritised next-phase design leadership could defend in the room — not a shelf report.
Pressure
Renewal window on multi-country governance. Thin political capital. No shared view: renew, redesign, or exit.
Southeast Asia · national scale
Outcome leadership defended
National pathway cabinet could defend: competencies, facilitator standards, ownership at scale.
Pressure
Successful digital skills pilot. Public deadline to scale nationally. Facilitator supply and access risked collapse.
In their words
Feedback from institutional partners — roles and sector context only. No client or individual names.
“The work was exemplary. We have the highest respect for their professional capabilities and recommend them without reservations.”
“Excellent support to a critical activity with a major multilateral and government counterpart. Highly substantive and timely outputs.”
“Reliable, efficient, effective and with the required experience and expertise to ensure the research is conducted to the highest possible standard and quality.”
“Excellent project management and very good technical knowledge. They collected and analysed a large volume of data in a short time to a high quality standard.”
Next step
RFP, programme constraint, or decision under pressure. Response within two business days.