Skip to content
Altamont Advisory
Altamont Advisory

Altamont Advisory · Arm 01 · Evidence & institutions

Core Advisory

Evidence and institutions strong enough for the decision that still has to be taken.

MERL. Strategy & policy. Institutional strengthening. Capacity that remains. Built for multi-country, multi-partner pressure.

Utilisation-focused MERL · strategy · institutions — senior team, not a lone advisor

Institutional weight

Built for material mandates

Depth across multi-country portfolios — Africa, Southeast Asia, and complex delivery environments.

950+

Institutional assignments

100M+

People reached

150+

Countries of delivery

300+

Specialists deployed

Shortlist materials for procurement and evaluation committees.

Download capability statements

Capabilities

What we own

MERL — Monitoring, Evaluation, Research & Learning

Utilisation-focused MERL: evidence leadership actually uses for decisions — not shelf reports. Built for multi-country portfolios, multi-partner programmes, and adaptive management under real constraints.

  • Baseline, mid-term, end-term, and impact evaluations (OECD-DAC aligned where required)
  • Theory of change, results frameworks, and indicator systems tied to decision moments
  • Mixed-methods research and utilisation-focused learning reviews

Strategy & Policy Advisory

Strategic direction that accounts for evidence, political economy, and delivery constraints — so options are real, not decorative.

  • Sector and organisational strategy development
  • Policy analysis, options appraisal, and roadmaps
  • Programme design and investment cases

Institutional Strengthening & Governance

The structures, mandates, and accountability systems that allow public and development institutions to deliver under pressure.

  • Institutional assessments and reform roadmaps
  • Governance, accountability, and performance frameworks
  • Process redesign and operating model support

Capacity Development

Capability designed to remain inside the institution — pathways, standards, and practice, not one-off workshops.

  • Capacity needs assessments and development plans
  • Training of trainers (ToT) design and evaluation
  • Leadership and technical skills programmes

Who we serve

Institutional decision-makers

  • Government ministries and public institutions
  • UN agencies and multilateral development organisations
  • International NGOs and foundations
  • Bilateral donors and implementing partners

Selected work

Outcomes leadership can defend

All proof →
AdvisoryHumanitarian & Development

Multi-region · Africa & multi-country portfolios

Outcome leadership defended

Board reallocation defended with comparable country evidence and a utilisation cycle managers actually used.

Pressure

90 days to reallocate mid-cycle across African country offices. Results incomparable. Partners disputed “good.” Millions at stake.

Discuss similar work →
AdvisoryGovernance

Multi-country · high-stakes operating environment

Outcome leadership defended

Prioritised next-phase design leadership could defend in the room — not a shelf report.

Pressure

Renewal window on multi-country governance. Thin political capital. No shared view: renew, redesign, or exit.

Discuss similar work →
AdvisoryEducation

Multi-country · Africa & Asia delivery contexts

Outcome leadership defended

Cascade standards, QA checkpoints, and facilitator pathways redesigned so institutional ownership — not workshop volume — defined success after close-out.

Pressure

Leadership needed to know whether cascade volume was producing transfer of quality — or only workshop counts — in multi-country implementation.

Discuss similar work →
AdvisoryGovernance

National · complex institutional setting

Outcome leadership defended

Prioritised multi-year strengthening roadmap — quick wins sequenced against structural capability investments leadership could fund and defend.

Pressure

A public-sector reform unit needed a defensible view of what to strengthen first under constrained capacity and multi-stakeholder pressure.

Discuss similar work →

One practice

Combine arms when the mandate requires it

Next step

Brief an advisor on the assignment

RFP, evaluation TOR, or institutional challenge. Response within two business days.

Download capability statements